Below are links to detailed critiques and refutations of various publications, mainly those relevant to estimation of climate sensitivity. Some of them are PDF versions of blog articles.
Below are links to detailed critiques and refutations of various papers, mainly being those relevant to estimation of climate sensitivity.
Osman et al. 2021: a flawed Nature paleoclimate paper?
Critique of Cheng et al 2019 “How fast are the oceans warming?” Version with responses from Cheng et al included
Resplandy et al 2018 “Quantification of ocean heat uptake from changes in atmospheric O2 and CO2 composition”
Resplandy et al. Part 2: Regression in the presence of trend and scale systematic errors
Resplandy et al. Part 3: Findings regarding statistical issues and the authors’ planned correction
Resplandy et al. Part 4: Further developments
Critique of Marvel et al 2018 “Internal variability and disequilibrium confound estimates of climate sensitivity from observations”